The Library
The Ultimate On-line Candida Resource
Glossary    Contact Us
Browse by Category
Your Are Here >> Library Home > Candida In The Body > How Candida Affects Us > Fungal Candida albicans makes everything worse


We'd love to hear from you - the Candida Library is for you. Let us know if you have any suggestions, ideas or feedback. Click here to email us.

Fungal Candida albicans makes everything worse

"A great article that discusses how other organisms enhance the survival and spread of Candida albicans in the body, or inhibit these same actions, and vice versa. A good look at some of the levels of interaction between Candida and other micro-organisms that creates the symphonic harmony of how the ecosystem of the intestinal tract functions. This article, like most of the research on Candida since the late 1940s, cites antibiotic use as the predisposing factor to the spread and colonization of humans by Candida albicans. The bottom line from this research seems to be that fungal Candida albicans makes everything worse. " - Dr. Jeffrey McCombs, DC

Candida albicans Interactions with Bacteria in the Context of Human Health and Disease
Diana K. Morales, Deborah A. Hogan

Click here to read the Full Text:

Humans are colonized by diverse populations of bacteria and fungi when in a healthy state and in the settings of disease, and the interactions between these microbial populations can be beneficial or detrimental to the host [1]. Among these microbial populations, Candida albicans is the fungus most commonly detected in association with humans [2], and numerous studies have described C. albicans interactions with its bacterial neighbors [1]. Here, with a focus on C. albicans, we provide examples of how bacterial-fungal interactions can influence human health. In addition, we highlight studies that give insight into the molecular mechanisms that govern the physical associations, interspecies communication, and changes in microbial behavior and survival that occur when bacteria and fungi occupy the same sites.

Bacterial−C. albicans Interactions Can Promote or Prevent Disease Top

Bacterial and fungal co-infections have been implicated in enhanced host colonization and virulence. For instance, C. albicans and Escherichia coli exhibit a cooperative interaction wherein E. coli enhances adhesion of C. albicans to bladder mucosa and increases the likelihood of fungal urinary tract infections [3]. Likewise, the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is markedly greater in patients colonized by C. albicans [4], and accordingly, antifungal treatments can reduce the likelihood of developing this systemic disease [5]. Moreover, denture stomatitis, an inflammation of the oral mucosa in denture wearers, is influenced by the presence of C. albicans and other oral microorganisms [6]. In fact, several studies demonstrate an association between C. albicans and oral bacteria such as Streptococcus (Figure 1A), Actinomyces, and Fusobacterium species [1], [7], and these physical interactions likely contribute to denture colonization and oral candidiasis.
thumbnailFigure 1. An overview of how interactions between C. albicans and Gram-positive members of the human flora may influence disease.(A) S. gordonii, a normal colonizer of the oral cavity, enhances C. albicans survival and persistence, thus contributing to the development of C. albicans infections. In this environment, S. gordonii adhere to cells by expressing a complex repertoire of cell surface polypeptides (AgI/II) (a) that recognize a range of host tissue proteins and cellular receptors [7]. After bacterial attachment, C. albicans can selectively attach to surface-bound bacteria by means of protein-protein interactions [10], [12] or by direct recognition of salivary proteins (basic proline-rich proteins, bPRPs) previously adsorbed by S. gordonii cells [11] (b). Coaggregation of the bacterium and C. albicans contributes to biofilm formation and results in closer proximity for cell-cell communication. Through a diffusible signal (DS) molecule (c), S. gordonii suppresses farnesol-mediated inhibition of hypha formation, thereby enhancing the potential for C. albicans to form biofilms and thus its ability to invade tissue [7]. In addition, Streptococcus promotes (d) fungal growth by secreting metabolic products that can be used as a carbon source by C. albicans [1]. Likewise, C. albicans enhances the survival and colonization of S. gordonii by reducing the oxygen tension to levels preferred by streptococci and by providing bacterial growth stimulatory factors as a result of nutrient metabolism [1], [11]. These favorable conditions promote the formation of mature fungal-bacterial biofilms surrounded by an extracellular matrix, to which (e) other bacterial or fungal species can bind. These interactions may make oral infections more persistent and harder to treat. (B) Lactobacillus sp., which normally inhabits the female reproductive tract, defends the host against colonization of pathogens such as C. albicans. Evidence suggests that the bacterium reduces the adhesion of C. albicans to epithelial cells either by (a) outcompeting fungal cells for adhesion sites, such as cellular receptors to which Lactobacillus has higher affinity, or (b) by secreting biosurfactants such as surlactin that physically decrease fungal binding. Most Lactobacillus strains release (c) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and (d) lactic acid or other fatty acids that inhibit C. albicans proliferation and invasive hypha formation. Bacteriocin-like substances (e) produced by Lactobacillus suppress the fungal growth to directly decrease its load [8]. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000886.g001
In contrast, lactic acid bacteria (Figure 1B), which normally inhabit the intestinal and female reproductive tracts, compete with C. albicans for adhesion sites and secrete substances that inhibit fungal attachment to control C. albicans invasion and disease [8]. Interestingly, imbalance in the normal bacterial flora caused by treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is a predisposing factor associated with C. albicans colonization of immunocompromised patients, probably due to decreased numbers of bacterial competitors [9]. Thus, antibiotic therapies that specifically target pathogens, in contrast to broad spectrum antibiotics, may help prevent secondary problems that arise upon perturbation of beneficial bacterial-fungal interactions.

Bacteria and Fungi Promote Coaggregation and Formation of Mixed-Species Biofilms Top

Both singly and together, bacteria and fungi form highly structured, often surface-associated, communities termed biofilms. A significant proportion of human microbial infections are biofilm-associated, wherein the formation of mixed-species biofilms could create a protected environment that allows for survival to external assaults and facilitates different bacterial-fungal interactions [1], [2]. The known relationships between C. albicans and oral streptococci illustrate the various ways by which bacteria and fungi can attach to one another or coaggregate using specific cell surface factors, leading to mixed-species biofilms [2], [7]. These adhesive interactions between C. albicans and other indigenous oral microbes can be mediated by protein-protein and lectin-carbohydrate interactions, and hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions may contribute as well. C. albicans molecules such as agglutinin-like sequences (Als) and specific cell surface glycoproteins have been identified as being important for coadhesion to mixed microbial communities in biofilms [1], [10]. O'Sullivan and colleagues [11] demonstrated that the oral bacterium Streptococcus gordonii adsorbs salivary proline-rich proteins that are recognized by C. albicans and act as receptors for the fungus (Figure 1A). Importantly, S. gordonii cell surface polypeptides also contribute to coadherance with the fungi [12]. Underscoring the complexity of these interactions, adherence and coaggregation of C. albicans with oral bacteria is species specific, and is mediated by bacterial receptors that might be expressed only under particular environments.

Interdomain Signaling via Quorum-Sensing Molecules and Other Microbial Products Modulates Fungal and Bacterial Behavior Top

Single species bacterial and fungal populations modulate their collective behavior using extracellular signals known as quorum-sensing molecules [13], [14]. Since this regulation generally occurs in response to cell density, processes like co-aggregation and biofilm formation promote the synthesis and secretion of quorum-sensing molecules, increasing the likelihood that neighboring cells will experience the signals at levels sufficient to induce a response. Thus, the study of bacterial-fungal interactions in association with mixed-species biofilms reveals that cross-kingdom communication between bacteria and fungi is a common process, and that quorum-sensing signals, known for their roles in intraspecies communication, can also mediate crosstalk between bacteria and fungi. C. albicans, as an illustration, induces its switch from hyphal growth to yeast growth using a secreted quorum-sensing molecule called farnesol [14], which inhibits the Ras1-controlled pathway involved in hyphal growth [15]. Strikingly, this small molecule can also modulate bacterial behavior and virulence by altering the production of toxic phenazines, such as pyocyanin in P. aeruginosa [13]. Moreover, farnesol can also induce the generation of reactive oxygen species in a number of microorganisms, likely through effects on electron transport chain components [16], and this process may play an important role in competition with bacteria. Notably, a number of Gram-negative bacteria secrete molecules with farnesol-like activities in that they induce a shift to yeast form growth by the fungus [17]. For instance, P. aeruginosa–produced 3-oxo-C12-homoserine lactone reaches concentrations in mixed-species biofilms that repress C. albicans filamentation [17]. By responding to these signaling molecules, the fungus may disperse from sites where other co-inhabitants such as antifungal-producing bacteria are present, conferring a potential selective advantage. Conversely, in mixed biofilms of S. gordonii and C. albicans (Figure 1A), a bacterially secreted diffusible signal enhances hyphal development by relieving the effects of farnesol on the fungus [7]. Moreover, cell wall–derived molecules such as bacterial muramyl dipeptides induce C. albicans hyphal growth, which may also promote fungal invasion of host tissues and virulence [18]. These findings support the concept that both eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms sense and respond to the diverse diffusible signaling molecules produced in the niches where they coexist. Furthermore, we may find that the chemical warfare between bacteria and fungi leads to increased toxin production and increased host damage and inflammation.

Chemical Interactions between Fungi and Bacteria Top

In addition to providing attachment sites for different species, bacterial-fungal communities create environmental conditions that promote or control the growth of other microbes. Actively respiring C. albicans reduces oxygen tension levels and provides stimulatory factors for streptococci in the oral environment, while the latter provides nutrients that promote fungal growth [1]. In contrast, commensal bacteria that inhabit the female reproductive tract, such as Lactobacillus spp. (Figure 1B), inhibit the growth and virulence of C. albicans potentially through secretion of organic acids and production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Supporting these in vitro findings, it has been shown that 96% of healthy women have H2O2-generating Lactobacillus species as part of their microflora, while these bacterial populations are lower in women suffering from vaginosis [8].

Bacterial-Fungal Interactions Influence Antibiotic Resistance and Host Response to Infection Top

Mixed bacterial-fungal infections can correlate with increased frequency or severity of disease. In fact, while C. albicans is the fourth leading cause of mortality due to systemic infections [1], [19], the risk of mortality may increase upon bacterial and fungal co-infection. C. albicans and Staphylococcus aureus, for instance, have synergistic effects where mice inoculated with only S. aureus show low mortality, whereas co-inoculation with C. albicans leads to mortality increases [1], [20]. It is not yet known how the host immune response is perturbed when bacterial and fungal pathogens are both present, but current research seeks to address this important question. The cooperative effects observed in mixed fungal-bacterial infections in vivo could be due to formation of biofilms, since this form of growth can promote resistance to both host clearance pathways and antimicrobial agents. Harriott and Noverr demonstrated that the human pathogen S. aureus forms larger biofilms with increased resistance to vancomycin when it is co-cultured with C. albicans [19]. Biofilms of C. albicans and oral streptococci are similarly more resistant to antibiotics than their single species counterparts [1], [2]. Matrix polymers produced by both organisms might result in a more viscous matrix that is more effective at restricting the penetration of drugs [2], [19]. Understanding the physiology of bacteria and fungi coexisting within mixed microbial communities will greatly aid our ability to effectively treat opportunistic polymicrobial infections and to modulate the behavior of potentially pathogenic bacteria and fungi in beneficial ways.

References Top

  1. Shirtliff ME, Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA (2009) Cross-kingdom interactions: Candida albicans and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 299: 1–8. Find this article online
  2. Douglas LJ (2003) Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol 11: 30–36. Find this article online
  3. Levison ME, Pitsakis PG (1987) Susceptibility to experimental Candida albicans urinary tract infection in the rat. J Infect Dis 155: 841–846. Find this article online
  4. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Tafflet M, de Lassence A, Darmon M, et al. (2006) Candida colonization of the respiratory tract and subsequent pseudomonas ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 129: 110–117. Find this article online
  5. Nseir S, Jozefowicz E, Cavestri B, Sendid B, Di Pompeo C, et al. (2007) Impact of antifungal treatment on Candida-Pseudomonas interaction: a preliminary retrospective case-control study. Intensive Care Med 33: 137–142. Find this article online
  6. Baena-Monroy T, Moreno-Maldonado V, Franco-Martinez F, Aldape-Barrios B, Quindos G, et al. (2005) Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans colonization in patients wearing dental prosthesis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 10: Suppl 1E27–E39. Find this article online
  7. Bamford CV, d'Mello A, Nobbs AH, Dutton LC, Vickerman MM, et al. (2009) Streptococcus gordonii modulates Candida albicans biofilm formation through intergeneric communication. Infect Immun 77: 3696–3704. Find this article online
  8. Boris S, Barbes C (2000) Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect 2: 543–546. Find this article online
  9. Hogenauer C, Hammer HF, Krejs GJ, Reisinger EC (1998) Mechanisms and management of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 27: 702–710. Find this article online
  10. Klotz SA, Gaur NK, De Armond R, Sheppard D, Khardori N, et al. (2007) Candida albicans Als proteins mediate aggregation with bacteria and yeasts. Med Mycol 45: 363–370. Find this article online
  11. O'Sullivan JM, Jenkinson HF, Cannon RD (2000) Adhesion of Candida albicans to oral streptococci is promoted by selective adsorption of salivary proteins to the streptococcal cell surface. Microbiology 146(Pt 1): 41–48. Find this article online
  12. Holmes AR, McNab R, Jenkinson HF (1996) Candida albicans binding to the oral bacterium Streptococcus gordonii involves multiple adhesin-receptor interactions. Infect Immun 64: 4680–4685. Find this article online
  13. Cugini C, Calfee MW, Farrow JM 3rd, Morales DK, Pesci EC, et al. (2007) Farnesol, a common sesquiterpene, inhibits PQS production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 65: 896–906. Find this article online
  14. Hornby JM, Jensen EC, Lisec AD, Tasto JJ, Jahnke B, et al. (2001) Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 2982–2992. Find this article online
  15. Davis-Hanna A, Piispanen AE, Stateva LI, Hogan DA (2008) Farnesol and dodecanol effects on the Candida albicans Ras1-cAMP signalling pathway and the regulation of morphogenesis. Mol Microbiol 67: 47–62. Find this article online
  16. Machida K, Tanaka T (1999) Farnesol-induced generation of reactive oxygen species dependent on mitochondrial transmembrane potential hyperpolarization mediated by F(0)F(1)-ATPase in yeast. FEBS Lett 462: 108–112. Find this article online
  17. Hogan DA, Vik A, Kolter R (2004) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol Microbiol 54: 1212–1223. Find this article online
  18. Xu XL, Lee RT, Fang HM, Wang YM, Li R, et al. (2008) Bacterial peptidoglycan triggers Candida albicans hyphal growth by directly activating the adenylyl cyclase Cyr1p. Cell Host Microbe 4: 28–39. Find this article online
  19. Harriott MM, Noverr MC (2009) Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus form polymicrobial biofilms: effects on antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 3914–3922. Find this article online
  20. Carlson E (1983) Effect of strain of Staphylococcus aureus on synergism with Candida albicans resulting in mouse mortality and morbidity. Infect Immun 42: 285–292. Find this article online

Keywords: candida albicans antibiotics bacteria intestinal flora ecosystem drjefftop imbalance fungal candida

Rate This Article: