The Library
The Ultimate On-line Candida Resource
Glossary    Contact Us
 
   
Browse by Category
Your Are Here >> Library Home > Treatments > Natural Products > Propolis > In Vitro Activity Of Propolis Aagainst Bacterial And Yeast

Back

We'd love to hear from you - the Candida Library is for you. Let us know if you have any suggestions, ideas or feedback. Click here to email us.

In Vitro Activity Of Propolis Aagainst Bacterial And Yeast

In Vitro Activity Of Propolis Aagainst Bacterial And Yeast Pathogens Isolated From Human Infections

A. FERNANDES Jr., M.F. SUGIZAKI, M.L. FOGO, S.R.C. FUNARI2,3 , C.A.M. LOPES

"The in vitro activity of propolis against 118 Staphylococcus aureus, 108 Escherichia coli, 60 Salmonella typhimurium, 50 Candida albicans, 23 Candida parapsilosis, 19 Candida tropicalis and 14 Candida guilliermondii isolated from human infections was studied by the agar dilution method. Among the bacteria, the Gram-negative were the least susceptible organisms showing minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 90% of the strains tested ranging from 22.5 mg/ml - 10,2% V/V to 23.1 mg/ml - 10.5% V/V. The MIC's for Candida ranged from 0.80 mg/ml to > 11 mg/ml (0.40% V/V to > 5.0% V/V), the strains of C. parapsilosis being the least susceptible. The relative order of susceptibility among all isolates, was: S.aureus > C. tropicalis > C. albicans > C. guilliermondii > C. parapsilosis > S. typhimurium > E. coli."

INTRODUCTION

Propolis is a resinous hive product collected by bees known to possess several significant pharmacological properties(2). Because of propolis diverse biological activities and increasing industrial interest, its chemical composition is of great importance. Furthermore, investigations have shown that individual compounds such as the flavonoids(1) are responsible for spasmolytic (quercitin, kaempferol and pectolinargenin), antiinflamatory (acacetin), antiulcerative (apigenin) or antimicrobial (pirocembrin and galangin) activities(2,3).

Since many reports dealing with propolis are not available to most readers, except as abstracts, and most of them are published by eastern European Journals, and a few available in Brazil(6,10), this study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity of some significant bacterial and yeast pathogens from human infections with the antimicrobial activity of propolis produced in hives, maintained and controlled in the University apiary.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PREPARATION OF PROPOLIS SOLUTION FOR TESTING: Samples of propolis were obtained from hives maintained and controlled by the technical staff of the Department of Production and Animal Exploration of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry of Botucatu, UNESP. After screening and homogenization procedures, samples were carried out from the production site to the laboratories of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology of the Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu, UNESP in polyethylene buckets with tight-fitting lids and stored in the dark at 5C. Solutions of propolis for testing were prepared asepticaly and protected from brigh light to prevent photo-degradation. For its preparation, the product "in natura" was dissolved by stirring it in ethanol 96 GL (MERCK) and submitted to filtration. The final concentration in each main solution was calculated to yield a standard of 50% (V/V), which corresponded to an amount of 220 mg/ml of propolis.

TEST ORGANISMS: Strains of bacteria and yeast pathogens for testing were as fallows: Staphylococcus aureus (No. = 118), Escherichia coli (No. = 108), Salmonella typhimurium (No. = 60), Candida albicans (No. 50), Candida parapsilosis (No. = 23), Candida tropicalis (No. = 19) and Candida guilliermondii (No. = 14), all sequentially isolated from clinical specimens of patients treated at the University Hospital of the School of Medicine of Botucatu, UNESP. The panel of microorganisms was identified by current standard microbiological methods according to Koneman et al.(4), and Kreger-Van Rij(5).

SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING: Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) by the agar dilution method was performed following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard guidelines (7,8). Strains of bacteria were grown in Brain Heart infusion Agar (Difco) and yeasts in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (Difco) at 35C/24 h. After incubation, five colonies of each strain were suspended in 5 ml of sterile 0.85% Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS), and then the suspensions were diluted 1/10 and 1/100 in PBS to yield a final inoculum of approximately 5 x 105 UFC/ml for the bacteria and 5 x 104 cells/ml for yeasts. By using the standardized main solution, serial concentrations of propolis were achieved (% V/V) in plates containing Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and Mueller Hinton Agar for the yeasts and bacteria, respectively, as follows: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and additional concentrations of 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.5 (%V/V) for the bacteria tested. Each antimicrobial test also included a duplicate of plates containing the culture medium plus ethanol in correspondent volumes to obtain intermediary and final concentrations of propolis as a control of the solvent antimicrobial effect. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Escherichia coli K12 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 2601 were used as control reference strains. After the inoculation procedures by using a multiloop replicator, plates were incubated at 35C/24 h and MIC endpoints were read as the lowest concentration of propolis that resulted in no visible growth or haze on the surface of the culture medium. Populational analyses of data were carried out by calculating the MIC for 50% and 90% of the strains of each group of microorganisms tested.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis of the MIC data was carried out by using the mean and median values as measures of central tendency and standard deviation (SD) and percentages [(P25%-P75 % among which 50% of the observations are seen)] as measures of variability. Comparison of MIC data among the yeasts was calculated using the analysis of variance with the F statistics. Contrasts among pairs of means were analyzed by the method of Tukey(11).


Full Article:

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-79301995000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso





Keywords: propolis antimicrobial activity bacteria yeast pathogens Candida sp

Rate This Article:

Related Articles

Antimicrobial activity of two brazilian commercial propolis extracts
Antimicrobial activity of two brazilian commercial...

Effect of Mexican propolis extracts
Effect of Mexican propolis extracts from Apis mellifera...

Seasonal Effect Of Brazilian Propolis On Candida albicans And Candida tropicalis
Seasonal Effect Of Brazilian Propolis On Candida albicans...